K
kasik
New Member
polish
- Apr 10, 2008
- #1
hi there
can someone tell me what expression I should use
in two weeks/ weeks' or week's time?
Thank you
T
Thomas Tompion
Member Emeritus
Southern England
English - England
- Apr 10, 2008
- #2
The weeks are plural (there are two of them), so it should be in two weeks' time.
sound shift
Senior Member
Derby (central England)
English - England
- Apr 10, 2008
- #3
I agree with Thomas.
K
kasik
New Member
polish
- Apr 10, 2008
- #4
ok thank you but I dont't undersand why the apostrophe is used
In two weeks' time
G
gremlin
Member
English only - Canada
- Apr 10, 2008
- #5
If you can believe it, the time belongs to the weeks.
audiolaik
Senior Member
Poland
Polish
- Apr 10, 2008
- #6
Hello,
Have a close look at the previous threads:
http://www.wordreference.com/definition/weeks'
Hope it helps!
V
vicky1027
Senior Member
usa english
- Apr 10, 2008
- #7
That's interesting. I was always under the impression that ... 's or ...s' translated to "is " (or are) Adding an "S" without an apostrophe makes it plural.
I guess what I mean is, I would have thought in two weeks time" would have been correct.
Vicky
B
Boston Dude
Banned
Love
English of USA
- Apr 10, 2008
- #8
tigerduck said:
Re: in two weeks/weeks' time/weeks time
Thank you for your answers.Funny, in my book (Handbuch des englischen Sprachgebrauchs - it is mainly written in German) it says with a plural construction you can use it with or without the apostroph (examples from the book):
In five minutes/minutes' time (days/days')
In singular constructions the apostroph is necessary (again examples from the book):
In a week's/month's/year's time
Source
The above is a quote from someone else's thread.
G
gremlin
Member
English only - Canada
- Apr 10, 2008
- #9
It is the possessive form of 's.
The weeks hold the time.
The time belonging to the two weeks.
I'm not 100% positive, but I think that German text is wrong.
M
mgwls
Senior Member
Buenos Aires
Spanish (Argentina)
- Apr 10, 2008
- #10
Perhaps what the text of the book really means is that you can say:
In two weeks.
or
In two weeks' time.
B
Boston Dude
Banned
Love
English of USA
- Apr 10, 2008
- #11
I just put that in to quote the other part. It is not my quote. It is that of another member.
G
gremlin
Member
English only - Canada
- Apr 10, 2008
- #12
mgwls said:
Perhaps what the text of the book really means is that you can say:
In two weeks.
or
In two weeks' time.
Yes! Seems like the German text is not wrong, just a bit confusing.
JamesM
Senior Member
Los Angeles, California
English, USA
- Apr 10, 2008
- #13
vicky1027 said:
That's interesting. I was always under the impression that ... 's or ...s' translated to "is " (or are) Adding an "S" without an apostrophe makes it plural.
It wouldn't be "he's wasting Lindas time." It's "he's wasting Linda's time."
The "'s" is a contraction of "is" in things like "it's, there's, he's".
panjandrum
Senior Member
Belfast, Ireland
English-Ireland (top end)
- Apr 10, 2008
- #14
Last edited:
T
Thomas Tompion
Member Emeritus
Southern England
English - England
- Apr 10, 2008
- #15
I thought we were being asked where the apostrophe went, not whether it was mandatory.
I think we need to have it, because we say in one week's time - never in one week time. This means we need the possessive apostrophe for two weeks too - i.e. two weeks' time.
P
panike
New Member
French
- Apr 10, 2008
- #16
the correct form is "in two weeks' time " because that's a possessive one. So, as far as I know, it's " s' ".
concerning kasik's question I'd like to get an explanation for that if anyone can help
SwissPete
Senior Member
94044 USA
Français (CH), AE (California)
- Apr 11, 2008
- #17
Fascinating discussion, but why even use the word time in the expression? Wouldn't in two weeks convey the meaning? Can week(s) be anything but time?
B
Boston Dude
Banned
Love
English of USA
- Apr 11, 2008
- #18
I see what you mean, SwissPete. But, adding the word time is very common. It kind of adds emphasis to the discussion. It is also something that we are more likely to hear in a professional setting as well. But, it is used very often in all topics of discussion. I guess it also depends on the person doing the talking.
A
_Ant
New Member
English - England
- Jun 16, 2016
- #19
SwissPete said:
Fascinating discussion, but why even use the word time in the expression? Wouldn't in two weeks convey the meaning? Can week(s) be anything but time?
I realise this is a very old thread but had to respond...
There is a world of difference. If I say "I will complete the task in 2 weeks" I could be saying that the task will take 2 weeks (and I could schedule it to be completed in a year's time). On the other hand if I say "I will complete the task in 2 weeks' time" the task itself may take only one hour, but I am committing to have it done two weeks from now. So the meanings are entirely different.
Aerialdan
New Member
English
- May 30, 2023
- #20
If I were to say, “I’m going to Ted’s house” I could also say, “I’m going to Ted’s.” Right?
So does that mean I could also say, “I’ll do it in 2 weeks’ “ meaning, of course, that I’ll do it in 2 weeks’ time.
You must log in or register to reply here.